Apocalyptic power struggle in Iran - SIR 30 November 2006
The international focus on Iran’s nuclear programme and its
alleged activities in neighbouring Iraq is diverting attention from a crucial
power struggle inside the country. Ahead of two elections scheduled for
mid-December, an SIR special correspondent in the region explains what is really
happening inside Iranian politics.
The two polls – one for municipal councils and the second
for the powerful assembly that oversees the regime and its military – are
shaping up to be a trial of strength between Iran’s hardline President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad and the Islamic Republic’s conservative supreme leader, Ayatollah
Ali Khamenei. The municipal election scheduled for 15 December is being seen as
a litmus test of popular support for Ahmadinejad, particularly within the
conservative camp which has become increasingly divided since the former
Revolutionary Guard’s unexpected victory in the 2005 presidential elections.
On the same day as the local polls there will be elections
for the Assembly of Experts, an 86-member body of senior clerics whose task is
to monitor the supreme leader and to choose his successor. This contest will be
the more crucial of the two tests.
Khamenei and his allies, including former president Ali Akbar
Rafsanjani, currently control the assembly, whose membership is selected every
eight years. However, Ahmadinejad is pushing hard to seize control of this key
centre of authority in a power struggle that is set to intensify.
Ahmadinejad’s chosen candidate to head the assembly is
Ayatollah Mohammad Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi, the president’s spiritual guide and the
leader of an extreme Islamic society known as the Hojjatieh. According to
Iranian insiders, this group has been steadily gaining influence for several
years and is increasingly seen as a threat to the conservative camp led by
Khamenei.
The Hojjatieh – an emerging power
The president relied heavily on support from the Hojjatieh
when he won the presidential election in June 2005. Since then he has appointed
members of the society to key positions in government, the diplomatic service,
and the military in order to consolidate his - and the society’s - grip on the
centres of power in Iran.
Mesbah-Yazdi, Hojjatieh’s chief ideologue, founded the
ultra-conservative Haqqani seminary whose list of alumni reads like a who’s
who of hardline Islamic fundamentalists. Many of the clerics who graduated from
his establishment now hold senior government positions. They include the Iranian
Intelligence Minister, Hojatoleslam Gholam-Hussein Mohseni-Ezhei, who has played
a key role in crushing dissidents, and the current Interior Minister
Hojatoleslam Mustafa Pour-Mohammadi. Both of these hardliners are alleged to
have masterminded the assassination of dozens of Iranian dissidents and
intellectuals in the 1990s. First Vice-President Parviz Davoudi is another
Haqqani alumnus.
The Hojjatieh was founded in 1953 by Sheikh Mahmoud Halabi, a
preacher from the holy city of Mashhad in northeastern Iran. Its core belief is
that true Islamic government must await the return of the Hidden Imam, or Mahdi,
the 12th descendant of the Prophet Mohammed. That meant it opposed even
Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini’s concept of Islamic government, velayat-e faqih
(the Guardianship of the Supreme Jurist).
The society maintains that a functioning Islamic government
actually delays the return of the Mahdi, who according to Shia beliefs went into
hiding as a child 1,300 years ago. Members also believe that causing chaos will
accelerate his reappearance. The Hojjatieh opposes religious involvement in
political affairs, although it has set that precept aside when it suits its
purpose to subvert the political establishment, as it now seems to be doing.
Planning for an apocalypse?
If Mezbah-Yazdi succeeds in taking over the Assembly of
Experts, he could promote the Hojjatieh concept of the apocalypse needed to
bring the return of the Mahdi and the dawn of a New Islamic world. This
frightening vision is apparently shared by Ahmadinejad who has taken a tough
line on Iran’s drive to become a nuclear power.
Relatively inactive during the reign of Shah Mohammed Raza
Pahlavi, the Hojjatieh enjoyed a revival during the 1979 Islamic revolution. The
society temporarily set aside its opposition to Khomeini’s rule because it
feared a communist takeover.
However, Khomeini became increasingly intolerant of the
society and its secretive ways, and on 12 July 1983 he ordered it disbanded. It
went through the motions, but many of its members simply joined the conservative
Islamic Coalition Association and kept their infrastructure intact
clandestinely.
For several years, Iranian conservatives have been warning
that the Hojjatieh was quietly infiltrating the centres of power. According to
such diverse political figures as former president Mohammad Khatami, a leading
reformist, and Ayatollah Mohammad-Reza Tavassoli, Khamenei’s former chief of
staff (and no ideological liberal), the Hojjatieh pulled off a "silent
coup" by getting their man, Ahmadinejad, elected in 2005.
It is worth noting that the new president’s first list of
cabinet nominees included Hojjatieh members and old comrades from his days as a
commander of the elite Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Although
Khamenei, through parliament, was able to block the appointment of some of
Ahmadinejad’s associates, the cabinet that emerged remains arguably the most
militant since the early days of Khomeini’s rule. At least 17 of the 21
nominees had held senior positions in the IRGC or in the intelligence community.
The conservatives strike back
Soon after the presidential election, Tavassoli delivered a
broadside against the Hojjatieh at a meeting of the Expediency Council, a
powerful body that adjudicates in legislative disputes between parliament and
the Council of Guardians. According to Mohammad-Ali Abtahi, a cleric who was
Khatami’s deputy for legislative affairs until he resigned in October 2004,
Tavassoli "voiced alarm that the leaders of the Hojjatieh group were now
practically in control of the executive branch of the government and the
Revolutionary Guards, and that the new president-elect was under their
domination".
Although conservatives controlled every centre of power in
Iran for the first time in a decade, in the opaque world of Iranian politics in
which the various factions are constantly vying with each other for dominance,
Khamenei saw Ahmadinejad and his associates as a potential threat to his
authority and Iran’s political equilibrium at a particularly delicate moment
in the republic’s dealings with the West.
The new administration’s uncompromising position in the
nuclear stand-off with the US, along with its populist economic policies,
violent rhetoric, and lack of experience in foreign affairs, are causing alarm
within the political establishment, especially among the old guard who
spearheaded the Islamic revolution with Khomeini. In some respects this
confrontation is as much a generational clash as anything else. Ahmadinejad,
widely seen as an incorruptible man of the people, campaigned on a populist
platform for economic and social justice and against rampant corruption in the
clerical and ideological establishment.
The supreme leader’s strategy
Khamenei has sought to outflank Amhadinejad and curb what
many Iranian leaders see as his impulsive tendencies. In late 2005, the supreme
leader turned to his old revolutionary comrade, and sometime political rival,
Rafsanjani in a bid to counter the young president’s self-proclaimed
"second revolution".
Khamenei also amended Iran’s power structure by giving the
Expediency Council, a non-elected political arbitration body chaired by the
pragmatic Rafsanjani, sweeping new authority to supervise parliament, the
judiciary, and the executive. This move created, in effect, a parallel supreme
authority.
Mesbah-Yazdi, who has long advocated so-called
"martyrdom operations" to combat the enemies of Islam, is the new
president’s ideological mentor and a Shia marja’a-e taqlid (object of
emulation). His hand was seen in Ahmadinejad’s meteoric rise in Iranian
politics, from provincial governor to high-profile mayor of Tehran, both
appointed posts, to president in just two years.
Before the June 2005 elections this firebrand cleric issued a
fatwa – religious decree – instructing all the members of the Basij,
an Islamic paramilitary force popularly known as "the army of 20
million" that supports the IRGC, to vote for Ahmadinejad. No doubt similar
pressure will be exerted by the Hojjatieh’s cadres during the December polls.
At the same time, General Yadollah Javani, chief of staff of
the IRGC - whose officer corps largely supports Ahmadinejad - has been publicly
exhorting his forces to back the president’s candidates in the forthcoming
elections. In contrast, the government-controlled media has been denouncing
Rafsanjani’s candidate in the assembly election, Mesbah-Yazdi’s main rival,
as a pro-Western stooge.
The outcome of December’s elections will prove crucial for Iran’s foreign
policy. A victory for the Hojjatieh would undermine current diplomatic moves,
thus propelling the Islamic Republic towards a direct confrontation with the
West.